The lights were bright, the boos were louder and the spotlight could not have been sharper. Juan Soto, the game’s elite stars, identified himself walking into familiar territory, however, the reception felt anything but warm. What was once a favorite place, ready to embrace the star, now seemed eager to forget him. Soto’s return to Yankee Stadium was not just another chapter in a long season—it was a reckoning. As fans’ chants echoed and eyes rolled, concerns related to his motives, thought process, and loyalty took center stage. And one respected voice was not shy about calling it out—David Samson had some sharp words.
When Juan Soto turned down the Yankees’ offer after a World Series run and signed a record-smashing 15-year, $765 million deal with the Mets, fans were stunned. David Samson did not mince words: “There was no loyalty to the Yankees. He did not care.”
This was not just a single decision in isolation—it was part of an enhancing trend. Despite a successful season and helping the Yankees to finally reach the World Series after 15 long years, Soto chose to leave. The team did everything to keep the star; however, as per Samson, the outfielder had already checked out. “Juan Soto, himself, was very clear. He gave a list to Steve Cohen and Hal Steinbrenner. Steve Cohen said yes to everything. Juan Soto was a Met. There was no loyalty to the Yankees,” Samson said. Just like that, loyalty was traded for luxury.
There is the twist: it was not just related to his exit. Samson claims the star was never truly a leader. “No love between the teammates. Juan Soto was not the most popular Yankee,” he said.
Whether it was his departure from the Nationals, where he turned down a $440 million extension, or his short stint with the Padres, Soto has established a reputation as a star who always has one foot out the door. Samson added, “Soto is not exactly the glue of a clubhouse.” He further explained, saying, “No love lost when he left the Padres, when he leaves the Yankees, when he leaves the Nationals. I’m not yucking on his skills. I’m merely saying that selfish players, who want their money, who want their stuff, who want to be treated differently, don’t always end well.”
This guides us to the heart of the matter: can a star truly cement a lasting legacy if he is remembered more for his contracts than his connections? As whispers turn into interaction and interactions into headlines, Juan Soto’s pursuit of greatness looks clouded by the price tag attached to his name.
The Yankees Revenge Tour
If Juan Soto thought a respectful helmet tip could soften the Yankees, he sorely miscalculated. The Yankees did not just beat the Mets—the team orchestrated a performance that was an analyzed clapback. Fans turned their backs. The scoreboard? It mirrored the energy in the stands: brutal and unapologetic. A 6-2 defeat could look tame, however, in reality, it felt like a public execution of whatever narrative Soto hoped to rewrite.
While he was in the spotlight in the drama, it was Carlos Rodón and the Yankee lineup that stole the show. Rodón provided five innings of analyzed grit and shut down the team Soto with just two hits and a single earned run. His 102-pitch outing was not pretty, but it was gutsy. Behind Rodón, the team’s offense wasted no time pouncing on Tylor Megill’s control issues and scored four runs in the third inning and transforming the game. In addition, when the moment of ultimate revenge arrived— Juan Soto in the ninth, two on, a scope to flip the game—Luke Weaver rose to the occasion and induced a routine flyout.
However, the revenge was not just in the numbers. The Bleacher Creatures, infamous for their no-nonsense loyalty, put on a masterclass in mental warfare. They booed and chanted, “F–k Juan Soto.” The slogan was consistent. For instance, the Athletic counted 38 times. They also threw shade with “We got Grisham.” This chant was soaked in irony, given Trent Grisham now outpaces Juan Soto in home runs. What began last year as “We want Soto” had flipped.
This was more than just a game in MLB—it was the Yankees’ rebuttal. One that said: You may have taken the money, however, you will never attract this town.
Every time Soto took the field, the fans reminded him. The loss was symbolic. For Yankee fans, this was not related to one win—it was about reclaiming pride. And as if the pain wasn’t enough, David Samson twisted the knife further. Could it be that Juan Soto, despite all the powerful fanfare, did not vibe with the Yankees’ culture? It could be that the prestige was not enough to mask internal friction. What is your take—did the Yankees fumble this? Was Soto simply never theirs to keep?
`
The post “Selfish” Juan Soto’s Affinity for Money Damaging His MLB Legacy Amid Doubts Over His Leadership, Claims Ex-GM appeared first on EssentiallySports.
